I know I’m very late to the party, but I recently noticed this post via a comment on “The Overspill” newsletter by Charles Arthur.
“Until we have an Apple Watch of our own, no one is going to take Android Wear seriously (opinion)” link
Essentially, this article calls on Google to create their own Android Wear watch instead of leaving this to their partners.
If Google is serious about Android Wear, it should be serious about building Android Wear watches – full stop. Only Google has the long-term motivation to keep the platform alive, and only Google can afford for its hardware business to be a zero-sum game in the name of building up an ecosystem. Without our own “Apple Watch” to act as a guidepost, as proof that a better smartwatch can be made, Android Wear seems doomed to continue on in stagnation and obscurity.
Of course, the problem with this argument is that it does not align with how Android nor Windows became popular. Google did not have to build its own phone for Android to gain steam. Similarly, Microsoft did not have to make its own PC to make Windows popular. In both cases, the respective companies followed a strict OEM partnership strategy. Essentially, this argument suggests a lack of understanding on why Android and Windows became popular in the first place.
- Both Windows and Android gained popularity on the back of the success of the Macintosh and iPhone respectively.
- Both Windows and Android were low-end alternatives to the Macintosh and iPhone. They did not necessarily bring something new, and in fact they started out being downright inferior. They were however cheaper.
- Due to the success of the Macintosh and the iPhone, customers were already aware that a GUI and a touch-based smartphone were very good ideas and that they would be useful. Apple had already educated customers to the benefits, and had primed the market. All that Google and Microsoft had to do was to make the same benefits accessible to the rest of the market.
So applying this to the state of smartwatches, we can foresee the following scenario that would take us to the success of Android Wear.
- Apple will continue to work hard to educate customers on the benefits of a smartwatch. Apple will explore what features resonate, and what a smartwatch would actually be useful for (something that is still quite ambiguous).
- Once the Apple Watch starts selling something like 20-30 million units per year, then a) customers will be fully aware of the benefits of a smartwatch and b) Google will know what to make.
- Then all that Google needs to do next is to collaborate with their partners to develop such a smartwatch that is half the price of an Apple Watch, and to bring the benefits to Android users. Importantly, it is OK for this smart watch to be downright inferior. Since Android users are currently >80% of the smartphone market, there is a potential for Android Wear watches to exceed Apple Watch sales someday.
My point is, Google does not need to make its own smartwatch. Doing so would not move the needle one bit. Instead, what Google needs to do is to keep their OEMs cosy until Apple Watch goes mainstream, and make sure that their team can pounce then. The risk here is that Samsung is going their own way with Tizen OS, and will not be with Google when the moment arrives. Google has to make sure that Sony, LG and others will not follow suite, and this is indeed the only meaningful thing they can do.
The funny thing is even among the huge tech giants, it is only Apple that can predictably make a new category product go mainstream. All the rest can do is follow.
One thought on “How Can Android Wear Succeed?”
I think the gist is that few companies have both the resources and the mindset to be consumer-, not tech-, driven, and to execute on that vision. Arguably, Google isn’t even one of those, consumers are its focus only as the main input to usage.
But I’m also not sure Apple is still in shape to assume the leadership mantle. The iPad is clearly being held back by defensive, backwards-looking thinking. The iWatch wasn’t the first smartwatch, nor the first fitness tracker.
Finally, I think a lot is only a matter of time and Moore’s law. The things need to last a full day, be usable on their own, and be cute. That’s just not possible today, it seems the proverbial “pick 2 out of 3” applies. And even then, I’m still not sold on the format. The only killer apps I can think of are fitness/health (rather niche), and ID/payments (needs a huge cross-platform support) ?